Wednesday, August 26, 2020

World of Warcraft (WOW) Essay -- essays research papers fc

Universe of Warcraft (WOW) Presentation As indicated by the World of Warcraft Community Site, World of Warcraft is â€Å"a greatly multiplayer web based game†¦enabling a huge number of players to meet up on the web and fight against the world and one another. Players from over the globe can abandon this present reality and embrace stupendous missions and brave endeavors in a place that is known for fabulous adventure† (â€Å"World of Warcraft Guideâ€Å"). In spite of the fact that the roots of MMORPGs can be followed to the 1970’s, the arrival of Ultima Online and Everquest, normally called UO and EQ individually, in the late 1990’s brought MMORPGs to a more extensive PC gaming crowd. Since the arrival of UO and EQ, MMORPGs have become a multi-billion dollar showcase. Universe of Warcraft went live in November of 2004, and its locale has since developed to over 1.5 million players. Viable people group the board was made a staple in the business by its two most outstanding pioneers. Network the board is imperative to the accomplishment of a MMORPG, and WoW is no special case. Requirement for Player Representation in MMORPGs An arrangement of correspondence between the players and engineers can possibly legitimately impact consumer loyalty. Jeremy Kelly calls attention to â€Å"it is accepted that engineers try to amplify profits† (Kelly). From a developer’s point of view, knowing the contemplations and sentiments of the player base is one of the most significant pieces of the continuous improvement MMORPGs are known for. Joshua Hong states that the key contrast between a MMORPG and other on the web or disconnected videogames is the presence of a persevering world (6). Making a MMORPG costs as much as 15 million dollars, and this figure does exclude the expense of proceeded with help after the game dispatches (Hong 8). â€Å"These games request virtual universes, noteworthy equipment prerequisites from the designer (e.g., servers and data transfer capacity), and committed help staff† (â€Å"MMORPG†). Because of the surprisingly enormous speculation expected to build up a MMORP G contrasted with typical games, MMORPGs just flourish monetarily through life span. It is subsequently basic that great correspondence exists so consumer loyalty can be kept high. As found in Figure 1, 63.5% of MMORPG players consider the most significant part of the game to be affected or legitimately constrained by mechanics coded by the designers (â€Å"Making friends† and â€Å"Pretending to be somebody else† are viewed as principally soci... ...esentation framework for World of Warcraft like the frameworks utilized in other driving MMORPGs. Works Cited â€Å"Blizzard Entertainment Announces World of Warcraft Street Date †November 23, 2004.† Blizzard Entertainment - Press Releases. 4 Nov. 2004. Snowstorm Entertainment. 13 May 2005. Hong, Joshua. â€Å"Play for Keeps.† Play for Keeps. 2003. Juniper Networks. 13 May 2005. Kelly, Jeremy. â€Å"Play Time.† Anthemion.org †Words. 8 Feb. 2004. Anthemion. 13 May 2005. MMORPG. 2003. Outright Astronomy. 13 May 2005. â€Å"Team Leads.† The Camelot Herald. 2005. Mythic Entertainment. 30 April 2005. â€Å"Who are Correspondents and What do They Do.† Station.com: Star Wars Cosmic systems. 2 Nov. 2004. Sony Online Entertainment. 30 April 2005. â€Å"World of Warcraft Guide.† World of Warcraft Community Site. 2005. Snowstorm Amusement. 30 April 2005. â€Å"World of Warcraft Sets New Milestone with 1.5 Million Subscribers Worldwide; Snowstorm's MMORPG Achieves Unprecedented Global Success.† TMCnet News. 17 March 2005. TMCnet. 13 May 2005. â€Å"WoWCensus - WoW Classes.† WoWCensus. 10 May 2005. 13 May 2005. Yee, Nick. â€Å"The Daedalus Project.† The Daedalus Project: The Psychology of MMORPGs. 11 May 2005. 13 May 2005.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Lack of a clear plan, ineffective leadership, marketing effectiveness, Term Paper

Absence of a reasonable arrangement, insufficient initiative, promoting adequacy, and absence of execution are normal issues of a private venture and how key arranging can help maintain a strategic distance from them - Term Paper Example Free possession infers sole ownership, association, organization, or some other authoritative document (U.S. Independent company Administration, 2010). Independent of the business, a private venture works in; it has been discovered that they experience the ill effects of to a great extent similar kinds of issues. Little size of a business undertaking guarantees that the administration goes about as a sharp cost controllers and dynamic individual from routine activities. This offers ascend to numerous authority related issues and loss of far-located dreams. The conversation beneath further subtleties the sorts of issues looked by private companies. A significant issue that pervades an independent venture is ineffectual administration. Authority, to be successful, ought to be persuasive enough for the representatives in order to persuade them to work morally and make esteems for their clients (Grenny, 2009). The vast majority of the pioneers today have no solid thought of their work. They engage in the problems of routine as opposed to focussing on the drawn out objective of the business. The issue appears to progressively across the board in private companies in light of the fact that the impulse to spare expenses are higher. Thus, to chop downward on the quantity of representatives, pioneers wind up turning into a piece of the activities as opposed to dealing with the tasks. Additionally, pioneers of such independent companies are frequently not prepared experimentally and their choices are the result of their encounters instead of built up administrative practices. Another regular issue among independent companies is absence of a reasonable arrangement (Harsberger, 2010). Absence of an arrangement brings about childishness of the business and occupies the director in adjusting all the exercises towards the shared objective of the association. At last, superfluous exercises bring about wastage of money assets which in any case could be applied all the more helpfully. There seems, by all accounts, to be an immediate relationship between's the lucidity of plan and the accomplishment of the business (Perry, 2001) Regardless of whether a business has legitimate showcasing system and plan, the execution

Friday, August 21, 2020

Bible Study for Atheists

Bible Study for Atheists This essay is not an attack on faith. It’s goal is to persuade non-believers that The Bible is a worthy book for study. Among my skeptical friends, most shun any  mention of  The Bible or Christianity. I suppose they’re afraid of being converted. That’s a shame, because understanding The Bible can provide useful knowledge of history, anthropology, sociology, psychology,  literature, philosophy,  language, memory, writing,  textual analysis, and information theory. Studying ancient texts takes us back to the border of history and prehistory, when writing first recorded oral tales that might have been around for hundreds or thousands of years. Understanding The Bible explains many of the memes of Western civilization, and it provides symbolic  keys for communicating with  people of faith. As an atheist I find Bible study a good tool for developing empathy with my religious friends, and a way to understand biblical allusions in art and literature. Religious people study The Bible to interpret a metaphysical view of reality. Non-religious people study The Bible to understand the evolution of human thought. Because the scope of Bible study is so vast, and I want to keep this first  essay short, I’m only going to introduce one writer: Bart D. Erhman. Ehrmans books on The New Testament are an excellent place to start because they cover a compelling range of scholarship topics and methods of analysis. His books are easy to read. More compelling than Dan Brown. Each book takes a different focus, and if you read all six, they provide a multiplex view of The New Testament.  The content Ehrman covers is standard subject matter at many theological seminaries, however I don’t recommend them to the faithful. Although Ehrman started out as an Evangelical, his obsessive  quest to understand  The Bible led him dissect it like an anatomy professor. That can be disturbing for believers, but wonderful for people like me who love taking machines apart to see how they work. The six books I’m going to cover are Misquoting Jesus (2005), Jesus, Interrupted (2009), Forged (2011), Did Jesus Exist? (2012),  How Jesus Became God  (2014), and Jesus Before the Gospels (2016). All these books were written for a popular audience.  They are about The New Testament, which is an easier place to start studying The Bible,  than  The Old Testament,  which is harder to fathom and further distant in time.  Characters in The New Testament are easier to relate to for modern people. The Old Testament needs a lot more scholarship to understand its complexity in context, but is endlessly fascinating for comprehending some of humanitys oldest recorded thoughts, and early speculation about reality. The value of Misquoting Jesus  is showing how a work of antiquity gets into our modern hands. Remember, all the lessons Ehrman teaches us about Bible study can be applied to any ancient work. How  were the books of The New Testament    written, who wrote them, in what language, and how did copies survive until modern times? Jesus lived over two thousand years ago. Are the quotes we read in red letters in The New Testament really his actual words? The gospels were written decades after Jesus died, by people writing in a different language than he spoke, to be read by us in a third language. For the first 1400 years, before the printing press, the gospels  were copied by hand, endlessly recopied,  passing  from town to town. Misquoting Jesus explores the problems of accurately remembering speeches from two millenniums ago. Jesus, Interrupted is about scholarship and trying to understand what the gospels say. How do we interpret the truth from four books that give different versions of the same story, sometimes contradicting each other. Are they historically accurate, or parables for interpretation? Do they use the same source material? Are they based on eye witness accounts, or second, third, or later retellings? Are the authors of the gospels the disciples they are named after? Is there any external evidence to corroborate these stories? Did each gospel writer have a reason to add content to the source material? This book is about textual analysis and those techniques could be used in studying any book. Forged is about why some of the books in The New Testament might be forgeries. Ehrman makes a case that 11 or more of the 27 books of The New Testament were written by people other than who we traditionally believe wrote them. Why, is rather complicated, and requires understanding the nature of authorship back then. Few people knew how to read back in those times, much less write. And there were people who could write but not read. Writers often wrote posing as another person for a reason. This book has many modern parallels to the internet and how information is spread. Did Jesus Exist? covers all the historical sources we have to document the life of Jesus. Outside of the gospels, there’s practically nothing. Ehrman makes a case that the gospels themselves are indeed historical sources. Ehrman  chronicles the history of  writers who have tried to prove Jesus never existed, and then provides his own analysis of why Jesus probably was a real, historical person. The lesson from this volume is we have very little concrete evidence for anyone  existing in the distant past. It also shows all the recent “biographies” of Jesus are probably 100% speculation. The techniques Ehrman uses to document Jesus in history could be applied to Plato or Cleopatra, or any person we think we know from the past. In How Jesus Became God, Ehrman tracks the transformation of an ordinary man into God. Did Jesus the individual believe himself to be God while he was alive? What proof do we have that any evidence for the historical Jesus is valid? How and why did his followers decide he wasnt a man? Why did they make him into God? How did they do it? And who were these people who shaped this theology? Where did all the attributes we now give Jesus come from? Ehrman works like a detective to solve a mystery, studying the evidence, showing how each generation altered the description of Jesus. Just compare this to scholarship on Abraham Lincoln, a more recent figure with abundant evidence of his life. We cant know the absolute truth so how often do we invent it? In his most recent book, Jesus Before the Gospels  Ehrman reports on memory, and how poor our memory is for recording events. This is my favorite of the six, and a valuable book for anyone wanting to write biography, historical fiction or memoir. Ehrman cites many books on memory, summarizing many case studies, which proves his point that we constantly change what we remember, even our own personal memories. After I read this book I doubted my own history. Ehrman presents a case that who Jesus was as a historical person is different from how we now remember him. That at every  step of the writing of the gospels,  through the early development of church dogma in the first three centuries of Christianity, Jesus was remembered differently. Every new creed changed Christian history. This book is a fantastic study on memory. I highly recommend it to anyone, especially for people who are confident in their self-knowledge. Even if you have no interest in Christianity, these books are worthy reads for learning how we study the past. Whether you  read or  write history, historical fiction, or memoir, these six books give a great deal to think about when telling a story thats based on the past. Think of all the biopics and biographies we’ve seen on Steve Jobs in recent years  â€" has any come close to being historically accurate? What we learn from Ehrman is how the truth is a glittery chimera we can never grasp, but we never stop trying.

Bible Study for Atheists

Bible Study for Atheists This essay is not an attack on faith. It’s goal is to persuade non-believers that The Bible is a worthy book for study. Among my skeptical friends, most shun any  mention of  The Bible or Christianity. I suppose they’re afraid of being converted. That’s a shame, because understanding The Bible can provide useful knowledge of history, anthropology, sociology, psychology,  literature, philosophy,  language, memory, writing,  textual analysis, and information theory. Studying ancient texts takes us back to the border of history and prehistory, when writing first recorded oral tales that might have been around for hundreds or thousands of years. Understanding The Bible explains many of the memes of Western civilization, and it provides symbolic  keys for communicating with  people of faith. As an atheist I find Bible study a good tool for developing empathy with my religious friends, and a way to understand biblical allusions in art and literature. Religious people study The Bible to interpret a metaphysical view of reality. Non-religious people study The Bible to understand the evolution of human thought. Because the scope of Bible study is so vast, and I want to keep this first  essay short, I’m only going to introduce one writer: Bart D. Erhman. Ehrmans books on The New Testament are an excellent place to start because they cover a compelling range of scholarship topics and methods of analysis. His books are easy to read. More compelling than Dan Brown. Each book takes a different focus, and if you read all six, they provide a multiplex view of The New Testament.  The content Ehrman covers is standard subject matter at many theological seminaries, however I don’t recommend them to the faithful. Although Ehrman started out as an Evangelical, his obsessive  quest to understand  The Bible led him dissect it like an anatomy professor. That can be disturbing for believers, but wonderful for people like me who love taking machines apart to see how they work. The six books I’m going to cover are Misquoting Jesus (2005), Jesus, Interrupted (2009), Forged (2011), Did Jesus Exist? (2012),  How Jesus Became God  (2014), and Jesus Before the Gospels (2016). All these books were written for a popular audience.  They are about The New Testament, which is an easier place to start studying The Bible,  than  The Old Testament,  which is harder to fathom and further distant in time.  Characters in The New Testament are easier to relate to for modern people. The Old Testament needs a lot more scholarship to understand its complexity in context, but is endlessly fascinating for comprehending some of humanitys oldest recorded thoughts, and early speculation about reality. The value of Misquoting Jesus  is showing how a work of antiquity gets into our modern hands. Remember, all the lessons Ehrman teaches us about Bible study can be applied to any ancient work. How  were the books of The New Testament    written, who wrote them, in what language, and how did copies survive until modern times? Jesus lived over two thousand years ago. Are the quotes we read in red letters in The New Testament really his actual words? The gospels were written decades after Jesus died, by people writing in a different language than he spoke, to be read by us in a third language. For the first 1400 years, before the printing press, the gospels  were copied by hand, endlessly recopied,  passing  from town to town. Misquoting Jesus explores the problems of accurately remembering speeches from two millenniums ago. Jesus, Interrupted is about scholarship and trying to understand what the gospels say. How do we interpret the truth from four books that give different versions of the same story, sometimes contradicting each other. Are they historically accurate, or parables for interpretation? Do they use the same source material? Are they based on eye witness accounts, or second, third, or later retellings? Are the authors of the gospels the disciples they are named after? Is there any external evidence to corroborate these stories? Did each gospel writer have a reason to add content to the source material? This book is about textual analysis and those techniques could be used in studying any book. Forged is about why some of the books in The New Testament might be forgeries. Ehrman makes a case that 11 or more of the 27 books of The New Testament were written by people other than who we traditionally believe wrote them. Why, is rather complicated, and requires understanding the nature of authorship back then. Few people knew how to read back in those times, much less write. And there were people who could write but not read. Writers often wrote posing as another person for a reason. This book has many modern parallels to the internet and how information is spread. Did Jesus Exist? covers all the historical sources we have to document the life of Jesus. Outside of the gospels, there’s practically nothing. Ehrman makes a case that the gospels themselves are indeed historical sources. Ehrman  chronicles the history of  writers who have tried to prove Jesus never existed, and then provides his own analysis of why Jesus probably was a real, historical person. The lesson from this volume is we have very little concrete evidence for anyone  existing in the distant past. It also shows all the recent “biographies” of Jesus are probably 100% speculation. The techniques Ehrman uses to document Jesus in history could be applied to Plato or Cleopatra, or any person we think we know from the past. In How Jesus Became God, Ehrman tracks the transformation of an ordinary man into God. Did Jesus the individual believe himself to be God while he was alive? What proof do we have that any evidence for the historical Jesus is valid? How and why did his followers decide he wasnt a man? Why did they make him into God? How did they do it? And who were these people who shaped this theology? Where did all the attributes we now give Jesus come from? Ehrman works like a detective to solve a mystery, studying the evidence, showing how each generation altered the description of Jesus. Just compare this to scholarship on Abraham Lincoln, a more recent figure with abundant evidence of his life. We cant know the absolute truth so how often do we invent it? In his most recent book, Jesus Before the Gospels  Ehrman reports on memory, and how poor our memory is for recording events. This is my favorite of the six, and a valuable book for anyone wanting to write biography, historical fiction or memoir. Ehrman cites many books on memory, summarizing many case studies, which proves his point that we constantly change what we remember, even our own personal memories. After I read this book I doubted my own history. Ehrman presents a case that who Jesus was as a historical person is different from how we now remember him. That at every  step of the writing of the gospels,  through the early development of church dogma in the first three centuries of Christianity, Jesus was remembered differently. Every new creed changed Christian history. This book is a fantastic study on memory. I highly recommend it to anyone, especially for people who are confident in their self-knowledge. Even if you have no interest in Christianity, these books are worthy reads for learning how we study the past. Whether you  read or  write history, historical fiction, or memoir, these six books give a great deal to think about when telling a story thats based on the past. Think of all the biopics and biographies we’ve seen on Steve Jobs in recent years  â€" has any come close to being historically accurate? What we learn from Ehrman is how the truth is a glittery chimera we can never grasp, but we never stop trying.